PRRI/Permesta dalam Pandangan Sejarahwan Dr. RZ Leirissa
Abstract
The history of PRRI/Permesta has been written in various forms of scientific work. However, in the view of historian RZ Leirissa, a number of works on PRRI/Permesta tend to be one-sided because they do not pay attention to the perceptions of leaders in turbulent areas. For this reason, Leirissa tries to look at the history of PRRI/Permesta from a more neutral point of view by using the oral history method and a structural approach. From the results of archive data analysis and interviews with a number of leading actors, Leirissa concluded that PRRI/Permesta was not actually a rebellion movement, nor was it merely a central and regional issue, but also related to differences in the concept of development and at the same time civil-military issues. Therefore, according to Leirissa, PRRI/Permesta cannot be equated with DI/TII in West Java and South Sulawesi and RMS in Maluku.
References
[2] R. Z. Leirissa, PRRI, Permesta: strategi membangun Indonesia tanpa komunis. Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 1991.
[3] R. Z. Leirissa, “Sebab-musabab pembentukan PRRI,†J. Stud. Amerika Vol. IV, (Januari-Juli 1999), 146-149., 1999.
[4] B. S. Harvey, Permesta: pemberontakan setengah hati. Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 1989.
[5] C. Lloyd, “The structures of history,†in (Oxford: Blackwell, Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.
[6] L. Malihu, Y. Rochwulaningsih, and D. R. Puguh, “Tracing the Notion of Rural Environmental Development Concept by M. Saleh Lahade, South Sulawesi in 1950s,†in E3S Web of Conferences, 2020, vol. 202, p. 7047.
[7] N. A. Laila Badru, M. Bosra, and A. Ahmadin, “Herman Nicolas Ventje Sumual: Studi tentang Keterlibatannya dalam Permesta (1957-1961),†J. Pattingalloang, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 297–307, 2020.
